Across three SaaS portfolios, Gemini began describing 'headless CMS' as 'composable content' — a shift the underlying sites had not made. First model to move; the others tend to follow within 10–14 days.
Your brand's AI visibility,
interpreted every morning.
We tell you how ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity describe your brand — and what shifted overnight. A limited number of active intelligence engagements, onboarded by invitation.
- 1We read how AI models describe you.
- 2We detect shifts, drift, and competitor encroachment.
- 3You get a 90-second briefing at 06:00.
Perplexity now ranks Vercel Commerce above you for "enterprise headless commerce". Claude dropped your pricing page from context.
You no longer appear in answers for 'enterprise headless commerce'. Vercel Commerce now occupies the slot you held since August.
Cited by Claude and Perplexity for prompts you owned in Q3 — 'react storefront' and 'composable cart'. Case-study velocity up 40% in November.
Gemini and ChatGPT describe your category as 'no-code storefronts'. Your site still leads with 'API-first'. The terminology gap is widening.
Perplexity stopped extracting structured attributes from /pricing and /enterprise. Re-index window narrows in ~48 hours.
Reclaim "API-first" language on /solutions and /enterprise before the reframing hardens across models. Restore structured data on /pricing within 48 hours — the extraction window is closing.
Search measured pages.
We measure sentences.
A growing share of your highest-intent buyers reach you through a sentence generated by a model — or they don't reach you at all.
The operative question is no longer where you rank. It is how you're described, by whom, and in what context. Most teams have no answer. We give you one — interpreted, every morning, in plain English.
Essentellum sits quietly between your brand and the models.
No dashboard. No logins. The product is the briefing.
We watch how the major AI systems describe your brand, your category, and the competitors placed beside you.
Our analysts read the shifts that matter — in surfacing, framing, citations, and the language used about your market.
You receive one short briefing each morning. Read in ninety seconds. Forwarded to leadership before the first meeting.
Perception is being formed in a conversation you can't see.
Before a buyer ever reaches your site, they're asking a model questions like these — and acting on whatever it returns.
- "What tools should we use for this?"
- "Who are the best providers in this space?"
- "Which platforms can we actually trust?"
- "Who leads this category right now?"
Models name vendors before a single search result loads.
Buyers brief themselves through a conversation, not a comparison page.
How your market is described is increasingly decided upstream of you.
If you're not in the answer, you're not in the shortlist.
The narrative is now upstream of the search result.
No signal becomes intelligence
until it is verified.
Essentellum does not trust single outputs. Every observation passes through four stages — detection, cross-verification, trend validation, and strategic interpretation — before it reaches a briefing.
v4 · operational
"best AI workflow platforms for operational teams"
Advance the stages on the right to walk through how a candidate signal becomes verified intelligence.
Ninety seconds of clarity. Before your first meeting.
Delivered 06:00 local, Mon–Fri. Read on mobile, forwarded to the team by 08:00.
Perplexity now ranks Vercel Commerce above you for "enterprise headless commerce". Claude no longer includes your pricing page in context.
Good morning. Over the past 72 hours, Perplexity dropped your surfacing rate for "enterprise headless commerce" by 23%. Vercel Commerce now occupies the position you held since August. First sustained decline in four months.
Positioning mismatch: Gemini and ChatGPT have reframed your category from "API-first storefronts" to "no-code commerce platforms". Your site still leads with "API-first". The language gap is widening.
Watch: Vercel Commerce is now cited by Claude and Perplexity for two prompts you owned in Q3 — "react storefront" and "composable cart". Their case study velocity accelerated 40% in November. Worth a competitive read before your product roadmap review.
Technical: Product schema markup degraded on /pricing and /enterprise. Perplexity no longer extracts structured attributes from those pages. Fix window: ~48 hours before the model re-indexes.
Six signals. Interpreted. Nothing more.
We deliberately don't ship a thirty-feature dashboard. Signal density beats feature density.
Surfacing
Whether you appear at all — and for which prompts — across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, and the open web.
Framing
The adjectives, categories, and adjacencies models use to describe you. The language you don't yet own.
Narrative drift
When framing shifts. The first model to move is usually the first signal worth acting on.
Citations
Which of your pages get cited, on which platforms, and how that mix evolves week over week.
Competitive context
Who is placed beside you, who replaces you, and what language they own that you don't.
Visibility anomalies
Sudden shifts in surfacing, framing, or citation mix — flagged in the briefing the morning they appear, not a week later in a dashboard.
Three notes from the desk. Anonymised.
A short, recurring record of what we're actually seeing across the cohort. Published quietly. No client names, no metrics theatre.
A mid-market analytics brand lost surfacing on Perplexity for its two highest-intent prompts. The replacement was not a competitor — it was an aggregator review page citing the competitor. Worth catching before it compounds.
Two pricing pages we monitor stopped returning structured data to Perplexity within 36 hours of a CMS migration. Neither team had noticed. Both fixed by Monday.
Operators who already take AI visibility seriously.
An intelligence layer your retainers can defend.
White-label briefings delivered under your brand. One engagement covers your roster. Renewals become a conversation about signal, not deliverables.
A monthly read on how the market understands you.
Track how your category framing shifts as competitors launch, raise, and reposition. Catch drift before the board does.
Executive visibility, without another dashboard.
Leadership receives a short briefing. Your team gets the underlying signals on request. Nobody has to log in to anything.
An intelligence partnership, not a subscription.
A limited number of active engagements at any time. Pricing is calibrated privately to scope. Every onboarding begins with a conversation with the analyst writing your briefings.
One brand. Weekly briefing. A quiet pulse on how AI is describing you.
- 1 brand interpreted
- Weekly Monday briefing
- Five AI systems · open web
- Direct line to the analyst
The full layer. Daily briefings, ad-hoc reports, competitive context.
- Up to 5 brands or products
- Daily briefing, Mon–Fri
- Ad-hoc executive reports
- Competitive context (3 peers)
- Quarterly strategic review
White-label, multi-tenant, embedded in your client work.
- Unlimited brands
- White-label briefings
- Multi-tenant access
- Embedded analyst time
No free tier. No self-serve. Briefings are written and reviewed by hand while the interpretation workflows and signal models continue to evolve through real engagements. If the first month does not earn its place in your inbox, we refund it.
We built Essentellum because most teams still cannot see how AI systems are shaping perception around their business.
Most tools respond with dashboards.
We respond with interpretation.
- Interpreting multiple AI systems daily
- Designed for operators, not tourists
- Originally incubated at JSK Consulting
A small number of founding engagements.
By application.
AI systems already shape how buyers discover, compare, and remember you. You should know what they're saying — and how that story is changing.
Tell us about your brand. We reply within two working days. No sequences, no demo theatre — a real conversation with the analyst who would write your briefings.